PDF to Quiz in Quiz Generation
Scenario-level performance from current published Results.
13 of 16 scenarios published
Where PDF to Quiz failed
6 of 13 graded scenarios. Open a Result to see the conversation and the evidence.
The teacher checks what the class struggled with
PDF to Quiz did not provide a class report showing what learners struggled with. A completed 47-question attempt scored 11%—5 correct and 42 incorrect—yet the teacher's five analytics panels remained empty after a reload.
View Result →One topic is weaker than the others
PDF to Quiz identified parallel circuits and meter placement as weak areas, then recommended the full original quiz rather than topic-directed practice. Its 47-question practice pool still included questions the learner had already answered correctly.
View Result →The learner returns to the material later
PDF to Quiz retained the learner’s history across sessions but did not use it to target weaker topics. Practice restarted the fixed 47-question quiz with a previously answered fuse question from the learner’s stronger area, rather than focusing on parallel circuits.
View Result →A teacher gives the quiz to a class
PDF to Quiz let a learner take a shared quiz, but did not provide results attributed to a learner or class. The teacher’s results panels stayed empty after a reload, and the learner’s signed-in dashboard was empty too.
View Result →Important information appears in both text and a diagram
PDF to Quiz generated 17 questions covering text-based ideas but left the diagram-only food web unassessed. The questions addressed energy transfer, decomposers and other prose-based topics, with answers that agreed with the chapter.
View Result →The user turns study material into a quiz
PDF to Quiz passed the English chapter quiz task and failed the Hindi one. In the English run, it produced multiple-choice questions with correct keys and later chapter coverage added in the second run. In the Hindi run, the language stayed Hindi, but two checked keys were wrong and one item had no correct option.
View Result →How PDF to Quiz performed
Open a capability to explore its scenarios. Each row reports the test set in its published Result.
Answer Feedback1 pass1 no Result yet
Capability in this benchmark →
| Scenario | Published outcomes | Test coverage | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| The learner gives a clearly wrong answer | 1 Pass0 Fail0 Not gradable 1 of 1 test case passedWhat happenedPDF to Quiz explained the learner’s clearly wrong answer by correcting the belief that bulbs use up current. It addressed the misunderstanding rather than simply revealing the right answer. | 1/1 assessed1/1 gradablePublished test set | View Result → |
| The learner's answer is partly correct | No published result | ||
Class Reports1 fail
Capability in this benchmark →
| Scenario | Published outcomes | Test coverage | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| The teacher checks what the class struggled with | 0 Pass1 Fail0 Not gradable 1 of 1 test case failedWhat happenedPDF to Quiz did not provide a class report showing what learners struggled with. A completed 47-question attempt scored 11%—5 correct and 42 incorrect—yet the teacher's five analytics panels remained empty after a reload. | 1/1 assessed1/1 gradablePublished test set | View Result → |
Grading2 pass1 no Result yet
Capability in this benchmark →
| Scenario | Published outcomes | Test coverage | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| The learner answers correctly in their own words | 1 Pass0 Fail0 Not gradable 1 of 1 test case passedWhat happenedPDF to Quiz marked the learner’s answer fully correct. The review screen gave it 10/10 for a response that kept the required meaning in different wording, and the brief pre-grading incorrect counter did not affect the score. | 1/1 assessed1/1 gradablePublished test set | View Result → |
| The learner answers some fixed-answer questions correctly and others incorrectly | 1 Pass0 Fail0 Not gradable 1 of 1 test case passedWhat happenedPDF to Quiz passes this mixed-answer grading case. Live marking, the review cards, and the final tally show correct answers marked green and wrong answers marked red, ending at 7 correct, 7 incorrect, and 50%. | 1/1 assessed1/1 gradablePublished test set | View Result → |
| The learner's answer is partly correct | No published result | ||
Learner Progress1 pass
Capability in this benchmark →
| Scenario | Published outcomes | Test coverage | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| The learner checks whether they are improving | 1 Pass0 Fail0 Not gradable 1 of 1 test case passedWhat happenedPDF to Quiz showed improvement from 53% to 85% while continuing to flag circuit measurement as needing work. Across 2 attempts of 47 questions, it counted 94 answers and reported mean and median scores of 69%, without claiming complete mastery. | 1/1 assessed1/1 gradablePublished test set | View Result → |
Personalized Practice2 fail
Capability in this benchmark →
| Scenario | Published outcomes | Test coverage | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| One topic is weaker than the others | 0 Pass1 Fail0 Not gradable 1 of 1 test case failedWhat happenedPDF to Quiz identified parallel circuits and meter placement as weak areas, then recommended the full original quiz rather than topic-directed practice. Its 47-question practice pool still included questions the learner had already answered correctly. | 1/1 assessed1/1 gradablePublished test set | View Result → |
| The learner returns to the material later | 0 Pass1 Fail0 Not gradable 1 of 1 test case failedWhat happenedPDF to Quiz retained the learner’s history across sessions but did not use it to target weaker topics. Practice restarted the fixed 47-question quiz with a previously answered fuse question from the learner’s stronger area, rather than focusing on parallel circuits. | 1/1 assessed1/1 gradablePublished test set | View Result → |
Quiz Delivery1 pass1 fail
Capability in this benchmark →
| Scenario | Published outcomes | Test coverage | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| A learner takes a quiz on their own | 1 Pass0 Fail0 Not gradable 1 of 1 test case passedWhat happenedPDF to Quiz let a learner complete an already available quiz on their own and kept one submitted attempt. The learner moved through the quiz, saw no answer or evaluation details before submitting, and the stored result showed 29%, 4 correct, and 10 incorrect. | 1/1 assessed1/1 gradablePublished test set | View Result → |
| A teacher gives the quiz to a class | 0 Pass1 Fail0 Not gradable 1 of 1 test case failedWhat happenedPDF to Quiz let a learner take a shared quiz, but did not provide results attributed to a learner or class. The teacher’s results panels stayed empty after a reload, and the learner’s signed-in dashboard was empty too. | 1/1 assessed1/1 gradablePublished test set | View Result → |
Quiz Generation2 pass2 fail1 no Result yet
Capability in this benchmark →
| Scenario | Published outcomes | Test coverage | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| A cleanly scanned document | 1 Pass0 Fail0 Not gradable 1 of 1 test case passedWhat happenedPDF to Quiz passed this clean-scanned-document scenario. It produced two 14-question quiz runs from the image-only chapter, and the shown review pages include correct keys and explanations. The evidence shows an image-only scan. In the evidence shown, the later circuit questions about battery internal resistance and a voltage-divider expression are keyed correctly and derived from values printed in the chapter. The free plan limited each run to five pages, so the chapter was handled in two runs. | 1/1 assessed1/1 gradablePublished test set | View Result → |
| Important information appears in both text and a diagram | 0 Pass1 Fail0 Not gradable 1 of 1 test case failedWhat happenedPDF to Quiz generated 17 questions covering text-based ideas but left the diagram-only food web unassessed. The questions addressed energy transfer, decomposers and other prose-based topics, with answers that agreed with the chapter. | 1/1 assessed1/1 gradablePublished test set | View Result → |
| The user asks the quiz to test a particular learning goal | 1 Pass0 Fail0 Not gradable 1 of 1 test case passedWhat happenedPDF to Quiz generated a question on the learning goal with enough answer guidance to judge a response. It asks learners to explain lamp failures in series and parallel circuits, and supplies an accurate model answer. | 1/1 assessed1/1 gradablePublished test set | View Result → |
| The user turns study material into a quiz | 1 Pass1 Fail0 Not gradable 1 of 2 test cases passed · 1 failedWhat happenedPDF to Quiz passed the English chapter quiz task and failed the Hindi one. In the English run, it produced multiple-choice questions with correct keys and later chapter coverage added in the second run. In the Hindi run, the language stayed Hindi, but two checked keys were wrong and one item had no correct option. | 2/2 assessed2/2 gradablePublished test set | View Result → |
| The user turns a recorded lecture into a quiz | No published result | ||
Reading these Results
Published evidence and test coverage answer different questions.
Which scenarios have a Result?
A published Result is public evidence for this tool on one scenario. “No published result” does not say whether testing has taken place.
What does each Result cover?
Assessed includes Pass, Fail and Not gradable. Gradable includes Pass and Fail. Both use the pinned test count in that published Result.
Out of 15 scenarios
The summary counts each of the 15 scenarios once. A scenario fails when any of its published test cases failed. “No published Result yet” means nothing is public for that scenario; it does not say whether PDF to Quiz was tested on it.