Does PDF to Quiz explain a clearly wrong answer?
PDF to Quiz explained the learner’s clearly wrong answer by correcting the belief that bulbs use up current. It addressed the misunderstanding rather than simply revealing the right answer.
1 of 1 test case passed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.
Feedback on a recognizable misunderstandingPassEvidence
Typed the answer into the answer box for Question 22 of the quiz.
Score on the graded card Score 1 / 10 AI Quiz Feedback for the whole quiz You need to strengthen your understanding of how circuits are connected and what current actually means. A key idea is that current is not used up by lamps; in a series circuit, the same current flows at every point, while the energy carried by the charges is transferred to the components. You should also review the difference between series and parallel arrangements, especially what happens when one lamp fails, when another lamp is added, and why domestic lighting uses parallel wiring. Another important area is circuit symbols and meter placement. Make sure you can recognise why an ammeter goes in series and a voltmeter goes in parallel, and why junction dots matter when reading diagrams. Finally, practise tracing complete loops carefully: many mistakes come from not spotting branches, breaks, or the role of switches and safety devices. Your next step should be to focus on the basic rules first, because they support almost every other question in this topic.
Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 1:45
Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 0:51
| ✓ | Expected: Explain why the answer is wrong, explain the correct idea, and address the learner’s misunderstanding rather than merely reveal the right answer.Found: The feedback explained that current stays the same throughout a series circuit while components transfer energy. The answer received 1 / 10. |
The explanation addresses the learner’s misconception, meeting the requirement regardless of placement. It appears in the whole-quiz panel; the individual graded card contains the reference answer, the learner’s answer and a score, with no feedback text.
Other topics in the feedback. The quiz feedback’s later paragraphs discuss circuit symbols and meter placement from the rest of the quiz, rather than addressing this answer.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | Quiz Generation → | 15 scenarios · 10 tools |
| Capability | Answer Feedback → | |
| Scenario | The learner gives a clearly wrong answer → | |
| Tool | PDF to Quiz → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · PDF to Quiz product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.