Does PDF to Quiz let a teacher give a quiz to a class?
PDF to Quiz let a learner take a shared quiz, but did not provide results attributed to a learner or class. The teacher’s results panels stayed empty after a reload, and the learner’s signed-in dashboard was empty too.
1 of 1 test case failed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.
A class takes the same quizFailEvidence
The tool's response has no text to quote: it is what the evidence under Proofs shows.
| ✗ | Expected: Each learner can access and complete the quiz, with responses and completion saved separately and attributed to the correct learner and class.Found: The learner completed all 47 questions anonymously: 11%, with 5 correct and 42 incorrect. No responses or completion were saved separately or attributed to a learner or class. |
The quiz was accessible, but class delivery also required results tied to learners. On a paid teacher account using the only sharing route, the completed attempt remained anonymous and untracked—a capability gap, not a free-plan or configuration restriction.
Personal progress panels. The teacher dashboard’s performance metrics message refers to the account holder’s own quiz completions, indicating that it reports personal attempts rather than class progress.
Link-only distribution. The Share Quiz dialog provides a link, with no controls for a class, roster, invitations or assignments.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | Quiz Generation → | 15 scenarios · 10 tools |
| Capability | Quiz Delivery → | |
| Scenario | A teacher gives the quiz to a class → | |
| Tool | PDF to Quiz → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · PDF to Quiz product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.