Scenario in benchmark · Version 1

One topic is weaker than the others

Two otherwise equivalent learner histories differ only in which topic is weaker.

How the tools performed

Every in-scope tool is visible. Outcomes come from current published Results for this scenario and benchmark version.

Publication availability: 2 tools have a current published Result.

No published result does not tell you whether a tool has been tested. Test coverage is shown only for comparable published Results.

ToolPublished outcomesTest coverageResult
Published Results · alphabetical, not ranked
PDF to Quiz
0 Pass1 Fail0 Not gradable
1 of 1 test case failed
1 of 1 assessed1 of 1 gradableView Result →
Quizgecko
1 Pass0 Fail0 Not gradable
1 of 1 test case passed
1 of 1 assessed1 of 1 gradableView Result →
No published result · alphabetical
DoctoQuiz——No published result
Edcafe AI——No published result
GPT-5.6 terra——No published result
Knowt——No published result
QuestionWell——No published result
Quizizz——No published result
QuizRise——No published result
Studyglen——No published result

Assessed = Pass + Fail + Not gradable. Gradable = Pass + Fail. Both use the published Result’s pinned-test denominator. — means not publicly available.

Test design

Pinned test cases
1
Disclosure
0 public · 1 withheld
Capabilities exercised here
Personalized Practice

What this scenario evaluates

  • Whether the practice focus changes when the performance history changes.
  • Whether each learner is directed toward the topic they were weaker on.
  • Whether the system avoids giving both histories the same fixed focus despite opposite strengths and weaknesses.

Exact wording, inputs, fixture state, expected output and detailed grading remain at the test-case level and may be withheld while the benchmark version is active. The scenario and its evaluation intent are public.

How the results are graded

  • Pass: the test-case expectations hold.
  • Fail: an expectation demonstrably does not hold.
  • Not gradable: the evidence cannot establish the outcome.

Version 1 uses test-case expectations; no scenario rubric is pinned.

Benchmark methodology →
One topic is weaker than the others in Quiz Generation | AI Demos