Tool in benchmark · Version 1

Dot in AI Database Agents

Scenario-level performance from current published Results.

6Passed
0Failed
22No published Result yet

6 of 28 scenarios published

CapabilityScenariosResult
Analytics & Observability1 pass · 0 fail · 1 of 4 published
Answer Presentation1 pass · 0 fail · 1 of 4 published
Conversational Interaction1 pass · 0 fail · 1 of 6 published
Data Access Control1 pass · 0 fail · 1 of 3 published
Reporting2 pass · 0 fail · 2 of 3 published
Question Answering0 of 4 published
Training0 of 4 published
PassedFailedPublished, different test setNo published Result yet

Dot passed every graded scenario it has a published Result for.

How Dot performed

Open a capability to explore its scenarios. Each row reports the test set in its published Result.

Analytics & Observability1 pass3 no Result yet
ScenarioPublished outcomesTest coverageResult
A user reports a bad answer and the operator has to find it
1 Pass0 Fail0 Not gradable
1 of 1 test case passed
What happened

Dot can find a complained-about exchange from a rough time and the member who asked it, then open it for inspection. It locates the chat in History by user and time, narrows it with a membership search, and shows the question and reply.

1/1 assessed1/1 gradablePublished test setView Result →
Reported analytics match what actually happenedNo published result
Someone needs to see what people have been askingNo published result
The operator needs to find the questions the agent is failing onNo published result
Answer Presentation1 pass3 no Result yet
ScenarioPublished outcomesTest coverageResult
The answer needs a summary and its detail together
1 Pass0 Fail0 Not gradable
1 of 1 test case passed
What happened

Dot did combine a headline figure with its breakdown. It gave an August sales sentence with a monthly chart, then a contribution chart and driver sentences; Furniture was the main driver.

1/1 assessed1/1 gradablePublished test setView Result →
The answer is a plain fact or a short listNo published result
The answer is a trend or a comparisonNo published result
The user asks to see the same answer a different wayNo published result
Conversational Interaction1 pass5 no Result yet
ScenarioPublished outcomesTest coverageResult
Customer corrects information given earlier
1 Pass0 Fail0 Not gradable
1 of 1 test case passed
What happened

Dot updated its answer when the customer corrected July to June. The corrected reply gave 11 June orders and the query limited the count to June; the earlier July turn was 18 against a reference of 19 and was not the graded one.

1/1 assessed1/1 gradablePublished test setView Result →
The agent offers what to ask nextNo published result
The follow-up is ambiguousNo published result
The next question refers to the previous answerNo published result
The user changes direction mid-conversationNo published result
The user narrows what they just askedNo published result
Data Access Control1 pass2 no Result yet
ScenarioPublished outcomesTest coverageResult
An excluded table is needed to answer the question
1 Pass0 Fail0 Not gradable
1 of 1 test case passed
What happened

Dot passed this scenario: it refused to answer because the returns table was turned off, and it did not use the table as the answer. The logs show only a search step, with no data fetch or SQL, and the reply pointed to Model for the switch.

1/1 assessed1/1 gradablePublished test setView Result →
An excluded column is asked for directlyNo published result
Two users are given different data scopeNo published result
Reporting2 pass1 no Result yet
ScenarioPublished outcomesTest coverageResult
The user wants several findings in one place
1 Pass0 Fail0 Not gradable
1 of 1 test case passed
What happened

Dot assembled revenue, category, and cancellation into one report. Revenue and category matched earlier chat answers; the cancellation figure came after a clarification and matched the PDF.

1/1 assessed1/1 gradablePublished test setView Result →
The user wants to keep an answer they just got
1 Pass0 Fail0 Not gradable
1 of 1 test case passed
What happened

Dot kept the answer available for reopening. Saving it as an app and reopening it in a new session showed the same title, date range, and June/July/August values, and the saved app re-ran the same query.

1/1 assessed1/1 gradablePublished test setView Result →
The report is run again after the data has changedNo published result
Question Answering4 no Result yet
ScenarioPublished outcomesTest coverageResult
The answer is available in the connected dataNo published result
The connected data cannot answer the questionNo published result
The question uses a term the company defines itselfNo published result
The user's wording doesn't match how the values are storedNo published result
Training4 no Result yet
ScenarioPublished outcomesTest coverageResult
The agent used the wrong definition and the user corrects itNo published result
The database's names are cryptic and the user documents themNo published result
The user sets a standing rule for all future answersNo published result
The user supplies example questions and the queries they trustNo published result

Reading these Results

Published evidence and test coverage answer different questions.

Publication availability

Which scenarios have a Result?

A published Result is public evidence for this tool on one scenario. “No published result” does not say whether testing has taken place.

Test coverage

What does each Result cover?

Assessed includes Pass, Fail and Not gradable. Gradable includes Pass and Fail. Both use the pinned test count in that published Result.

Scenario scope

Out of 28 scenarios

The summary counts each of the 28 scenarios once. A scenario fails when any of its published test cases failed. “No published Result yet” means nothing is public for that scenario; it does not say whether Dot was tested on it.

Dot in AI Database Agents | AI Demos