Can Dot assemble several live findings into one report?
Dot assembled revenue, category, and cancellation into one report. Revenue and category matched earlier chat answers; the cancellation figure came after a clarification and matched the PDF.
1 of 1 test case passed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.
Three findings assembled into one artifactPassEvidence
Input 1: “As of September 2, 2026, what was our total revenue last month?”
Input 2: “What's our best-selling product category?”
Input 3: “What's our current cancellation rate?”
Input 4: “Put all of that together into one report.”
Input 5: “Order cancellations, across all orders as they stand today.”
Response 1 answers Input 1.
Response 2 answers Input 2.
Response 3 (Cancellation scope question) is a question the tool asked about Input 3; it is not an answer.
Response 4 (Report scope question) is a question the tool asked about Input 4; it is not an answer.
Response 5, the final response, answers Input 5.
Your current order cancellation rate is 21.8%: 67 of 308 orders are cancelled as of today, October 20.
Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 3:16
Every message the tool sent, in order (5)
- August revenue answer
August 2026 order revenue was $8,795 as of September 2, 2026. This sums August orders, excluding cancellations recorded by September 2. It does not deduct refunds or include subscription revenue.
- Category answer
Outdoor & Patio led August 2026 with $1,806 in order revenue as of September 2, using the same exclusions as before.
- Cancellation scope question
Do you mean order cancellations or subscription cancellations—and should I use October to date or keep the September 2 reporting cutoff?
- Report scope question
I can combine the August revenue and category findings into one report. For the cancellation section, should I use order cancellations or subscription cancellations, and October to date or the September 2 cutoff?
- Cancellation answer with report
The final response, printed above.
| ✓ | Expected: One report containing all three answers, each agreeing with the answer to the same question asked directly.Found: Earlier chat and PDF agree: revenue $8,795; Outdoor and Patio leads at $1,806. PDF table: revenue $8,795.45; leader 1 order; Home Decor most orders, 7. After two clarifications, cancellation first arrived with the PDF: both 21.8%, 67 of 308. |
One report retained all three answers. A cancellation answer given alongside the PDF still meets the requirement: agreement with a directly asked question, not necessarily an earlier answer.
Category ranking basis. The category ranking uses August 2026 order revenue, not units sold; Dot carried the month forward from the revenue question.
Report documentation and live link. The report identifies order data and status history as its sources, explains the differing revenue and cancellation periods, and includes a link to a live report.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | AI Database Agents → | 28 scenarios · 11 tools |
| Capability | Reporting → | |
| Scenario | The user wants several findings in one place → | |
| Tool | Dot → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · Dot product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.