Does Nanonets keep a lookalike total row out of repeated-line-item extraction?
Nanonets passed this lookalike-row scenario. It returned five genuine line items and left out the lookalike Total row; the input table shows that row in the same layout, and the output has no 'Total' entry or 1,982 amount.
1 of 1 test case passed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.
Total row is not a memberPassEvidence
“Extract the following field from this document and return the result as JSON: line_items — an array of objects with description, quantity, unit_price, amount, for the genuine line items only.”
{ "line_items": [ { "description": "Retail Shelving Unit - Steel, 5-Tier", "quantity": 6, "unit_price": 84, "amount": 504 }, { "description": "Checkout Counter - Laminate Top", "quantity": 2, "unit_price": 310, "amount": 620 }, { "description": "Security Tag Deactivator - Handheld", "quantity": 4, "unit_price": 45.5, "amount": 182 }, { "description": "Price Label Printer - Thermal", "quantity": 3, "unit_price": 162, "amount": 486 }, { "description": "Shopping Basket - 20L, Set of 10", "quantity": 5, "unit_price": 38, "amount": 190 } ] }
Exported JSON with five matching line items
Copied from Output file (JSON), lines 1–34
Open the JSON file ↗| ✓ | Expected: Only the genuine line items, with count and membership judged separately.Found: It returned five matching line items and omitted the lookalike Total row; none carried the 1,982 total. |
The task asked for only genuine line items. The output has five matching members and leaves out the lookalike Total row, so this case passes.
Number types. The exported quantities, unit prices and amounts were numbers, not strings.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | Structured Document Extraction → | 19 scenarios · 10 tools |
| Capability | Nested & Repeated Fields → | |
| Scenario | The set contains a non-record → | |
| Tool | Nanonets → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · Nanonets product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.