AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 8 November 2026

Does Studyglen accurately grade a learner’s mix of correct and incorrect fixed answers?

Studyglen correctly graded the learner’s mix of correct and incorrect fixed answers. It reported 10 correct and 10 incorrect answers, giving 50% for 10 correct out of 20.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.

Mixed correct and incorrect fixed answersPassEvidence
What we sent

We submitted the completed Series and Parallel Circuits quiz through the Submit quiz button, with all 20 questions answered.

What the tool returned

The tool's response has no text to quote: it is what the evidence under Proofs shows.

Proof 5 · Screenshot

Proof 2 · Screenshot

Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: Judge each response against the correct answer key, distinguish correct from incorrect responses accurately, and calculate an attempt total consistent with those judgments.Found: Questions 5 and 6 were marked correct; questions 8 and 20 were marked incorrect. The total was 50%: 10 correct out of 20, with 10 incorrect.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screen recording
Screen recording: the learner’s answers, quiz submission, score and question-by-question grading
Key moments
Open original ↗
Proof 2Screenshot
Result screenshot: 50% from 10 correct answers and 10 incorrect answers
Open original ↗
Proof 3Screenshot
Review screenshot: the score and question 1 marked incorrect
Open original ↗
Proof 4Screenshot
Review screenshot: questions 5 and 6 marked correct
Open original ↗
Proof 5Screenshot
Review screenshot: question 8 marked incorrect, with its correct answer and explanation
Open original ↗
Proof 6Screenshot
Review screenshot: question 20 marked incorrect and the correct ammeter connection
Open original ↗
Why this result

Studyglen graded the whole completed attempt submitted through the learner interface. Its marks agree with the source chapter, not just its own answer key, and its percentage follows from the correct-answer count. This meets the requirement for accurate per-question grading and a consistent total.

Also observed in this test case

Similar-looking answer choices. Question 8’s first and fourth options look similar but mean different things. The weakness is in answer-choice wording, not grading.

Explanations linked to source material. Every marked question includes an explanation and a reference to its source document, allowing the learner to trace the grading back to the material.

Tested by Anshika Gupta · evidence dated 23 October 2026

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
Studyglen
Build or version
Not exposed by the hosted product
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
The Series and Parallel Circuits quiz needed a correct fixed-answer key. A completed learner attempt containing both correct and incorrect answers had to be submitted through the normal quiz interface.
Tested
23 October 2026 · Anshika Gupta

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
10 November 2026First publishedQuiz Generation v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/quiz-generation/results/studyglen/mixed-correct-incorrect-responses · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-11-08

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

Proof 2 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 244 KB
Proof 3 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 261 KB
Proof 4 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 212 KB
Proof 5 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 268 KB
Proof 6 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 224 KB
File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screen recording23d91de5e83d79b205964a1471782e7aa6f414c5afe45b2f50150f63d9f617ea
Proof 2 · Screenshot9d00de24110ae7accb4193418f5d4e5ec9577e37254a5d7cd6961ba66214d0b0
Proof 3 · Screenshot33f9cfc4baafd7f4670bbb09152f82b67efe6c29f372f0fff1c3fc7373e424db
Proof 4 · Screenshotef6ab42f50d68d80c1d431a7f3acea91ea52b8c94f7637bc7d05eb47e29c09e8
Proof 5 · Screenshot2defdb1aff6a685710edecd0fe327aa5768d00135b5f59d965613f8046657acf
Proof 6 · Screenshotf0907ae845c685af469a1d342fdd5dd5121b25070cc6c0a9e3b9be58664b9fb7