Can QuestionWell turn study material into a quiz covering its core ideas?
QuestionWell produced multiple-choice quizzes from both chapters, with answer-quality problems in each. One quiz had a defensible unkeyed option and repeated a core idea. The Hindi quiz used Hindi throughout, but keyed equal branch currents despite the chapter’s 0.30 A and 0.18 A examples; another item’s statement did not fit its answer choices.
2 of 2 test cases failed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The 2 test cases
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on these test cases.
Study material to an ordinary multiple-choice quizFailEvidence
We used the quiz request form to request 30 multiple-choice questions based on the uploaded electric-circuits chapter.
The tool's response has no text to quote: it is what the evidence under Proofs shows.
| ✗ | Expected: Clear, answerable, source-supported multiple-choice questions with correct keys, no defensibly correct alternatives, and core ideas covered without omissions or redundant testing.Found: Question 12 keys tracing battery paths; counting wire dots is also defensible. Questions 13 and 14 both test equal current throughout a series circuit. |
The requested quiz was generated from the chapter, so the problem is its content, not the request. Most keys fit the material, but a second defensible answer and repeated testing of one rule break the requirements for unambiguous answers and non-redundant coverage.
Same-language quiz from same-language materialFailEvidence
Quiz question 10 10. श्रेणीक्रम परिपथ में जोड़कर एक अतिरिक्त लैंप तोड़ा जाएगा। A कुछ लैंप्स अधिक चमकेंगे · B कुछ लैंप्स चमक सकते हैं · C लैंप्स बिल्कुल सामान्य होंगे · D (keyed) सभी लैंप्स मंद हो जाएंगे Quiz question 16 16. समानांतर क्रम में धारा शाखाओं में किस तरह बाँटी जाती है? A सभी शाखाओं में वितरित · B शाखाओं के विषम हिस्से मेल · C (keyed) प्रत्येक शाखा में समान · D एक शाखा में अधिकाधिक
Transcribed from Proof 2 · Screenshot
Transcribed from Proof 3 · Screenshot
| ✗ | Expected: Hindi-only, meaning-preserving multiple-choice questions, options and keys; clear, answerable, source-supported questions; correct keys without defensibly correct alternatives; core ideas covered without omissions or repetition.Found: Question 16 keys equal branch currents; the chapter gives 0.30 A and 0.18 A. Question 10 describes breaking a lamp; its options address adding one. |
The quiz met the Hindi and multiple-choice requirements. Question 16 should describe current distributed among branches, not necessarily equally; question 10 cannot be answered as written. Either the incorrect key or the unclear item is enough to make the quiz fall short.
Socket questions differ. Question 17 identifies series wiring in a hypothetical simultaneous socket failure; question 18 identifies parallel wiring for actual household sockets. Both answer keys fit their respective questions.
Shorter Hindi quiz. The Hindi quiz contained 20 questions rather than the 30 requested.
Other circuit answers. Question 15 keys unchanged lamp brightness when one parallel lamp is removed, and question 20 keys a parallel voltmeter connection. Both keys are correct.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | Quiz Generation → | 15 scenarios · 10 tools |
| Capability | Quiz Generation → | |
| Scenario | The user turns study material into a quiz → | |
| Tool | QuestionWell → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · QuestionWell product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.