Does QuestionWell show learner progress when one topic improves and another stays weak?
QuestionWell fails this scenario: the learner view shows only whole-quiz scores, not topic-level progress. The same attempts appear broken out by learning outcome on the teacher side, so the missing detail exists but is not shown to learners.
1 of 1 test case failed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.
Progress agrees with the attempts behind itFailEvidence
We opened the learner-facing progress view.
The tool's response has no text to quote: it is what the evidence under Proofs shows.
Proof 2 · Screen recording · ▶ 4:58
| ✗ | Expected: The progress should match the attempts, show the improved topic more positively, keep the weak topic marked as needing work, and avoid full mastery claims.Found: It matches the attempts but shows only whole-quiz scores, so the improved topic and the weak topic are not separated out. |
It is a fail because the learner surface shows only whole-quiz scores for the attempts, while the same attempts appear by learning outcome on the teacher side. No available setting produces the topic-level view the scenario requires.
Teacher grid separates outcomes. The teacher side breaks the same attempts out by learning outcome, so the learner gap is in the learner view, not the data.
Later score appears again. A later attempt scored 8/20 on 22 October, and the dashboard listed it as another whole-quiz score.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | Quiz Generation → | 15 scenarios · 10 tools |
| Capability | Learner Progress → | |
| Scenario | The learner checks whether they are improving → | |
| Tool | QuestionWell → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · QuestionWell product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.