Does Basedash combine several findings into one report?
Basedash passed this scenario. One chat shows three separate answers and a fourth report that repeats the same figures: August revenue $8,795.45, a bedding and rugs/home decor tie at 106 units each, Furniture at $51,248.25, and a 21.75% cancellation rate. Its verification query returned the same values.
1 of 1 test case passed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.
Three findings assembled into one artifactPassEvidence
Input 1: “As of September 2, 2026, what was our total revenue last month?”
Input 2: “What's our best-selling product category?”
Input 3: “What's our current cancellation rate?”
Input 4: “Put all of that together into one report.”
Response 1 replies to Input 1.
Response 2 replies to Input 2.
Response 3 replies to Input 3.
Response 4 replies to Input 4.
Response to input 1 Total revenue for August 2026 was $8,795.45, using order totals for orders placed August 1–31 in Asia/Calcutta time and excluding cancelled orders. Response to input 2 Bedding & Rugs and Home Decor tie as our best-selling categories, with 106 units sold each. By sales revenue instead, Furniture leads at $51,248.25. Response to input 3 Our current order cancellation rate is 21.75% — 67 cancelled orders out of 308 total orders. Response to input 4 August order revenue was $8,795.45. Bedding & Rugs and Home Decor tied for the most units sold, while the current order cancellation rate is 21.75%.
Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 0:04
Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 0:12
Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 0:24
Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 0:30
| ✓ | Expected: One report keeping each earlier answer aligned with the same question asked directly.Found: The fourth turn repeats the same revenue, category, and cancellation figures with the same scopes, and its verification query returns the same numbers. |
The report had to keep the earlier figures aligned in one place, and it does: the fourth answer repeats the same revenue, category, and cancellation values with the same scopes, and its verification query returns the same numbers.
Genuine tie. The second answer keeps both categories tied at 106 units and also names Furniture as the revenue leader.
Scope split. The category and cancellation answers cover all available dates, while the revenue answer stays on August.
Verified again. The report reruns a verification query and gets the same numbers again.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | AI Database Agents → | 28 scenarios · 11 tools |
| Capability | Reporting → | |
| Scenario | The user wants several findings in one place → | |
| Tool | Basedash → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · Basedash product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.