Can AskYourDatabase show the same answer in a different form?
AskYourDatabase presented the same category revenue figures as a horizontal bar chart on request. All seven amounts stayed the same to the cent, including outdoor and patio revenue of $7,744.59 in both forms.
1 of 1 test case passed
Every test case in this scenario has a result.
The test case
Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.
Same answer, different representationPassEvidence
“Can you show that as a chart instead?”
Here's your August 2026 revenue by category as a chart: The chart makes the story clear at a glance — Outdoor & Patio (highlighted in red) dominates, accounting for over half of the month's revenue, while the remaining categories are relatively small and closely clustered.
Transcribed from Proof 2 · Screenshot
Every message the tool sent, in order (3)
- Python code for the chart · not part of the answer
import requests import pandas as pd import matplotlib.pyplot as plt # Fetch data url = "https://www.askyourdatabase.com/api/data-response?hashid=[id hidden] data = requests.get(url).json() df = pd.DataFrame(data) df['revenue'] = df['revenue'].astype(float) # Sort descending df = df.sort_values('revenue', ascending=True) fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 6)) colors = ['#4C78A8' if c != 'outdoor_and_patio' else '#E45756' for c in df['category']] bars = ax.barh(df['category'].str.replace('_', ' ').str.title(), df['revenue'], color=colors) for bar, val in zip(bars, df['revenue']): ax.text(bar.get_width() + 50, bar.get_y() + bar.get_height()/2, f'${val:,.2f}', va='center', fontsize=10) ax.set_xlabel('Revenue (USD)') ax.set_title('August 2026 Revenue by Category') ax.spines['top'].set_visible(False) ax.spines['right'].set_visible(False) plt.tight_layout() plt.savefig('/home/user/august_revenue_by_category.png', dpi=120) print("Chart saved.") - Chart introduction
Here's your August 2026 revenue by category as a chart:
- Chart takeaway
The chart makes the story clear at a glance — Outdoor & Patio (highlighted in red) dominates, accounting for over half of the month's revenue, while the remaining categories are relatively small and closely clustered.
| ✓ | Expected: Change the presentation without changing any of the underlying values.Found: Table and horizontal chart both show outdoor and patio $7,744.59; bedding and rugs $1,462.96; kitchen and dining $1,340.68; furniture $1,099.30; lighting $904.09; home decor $596.03; storage and organization $294.29. |
The presentation had to change without altering the answer; the horizontal chart preserved all seven table amounts. The chart’s download link expires after 14 days, and its file is not included, so the values are read from the screenshot.
Static chart with value labels. The revenue chart is a static image, not interactive. Each bar has a value label, so no hovering is needed.
Saved result reused. For the revenue chart, the product reused the earlier saved result rather than querying the database again.
Code before the answer. The chart reply displays a block of Python code above the answer, so technical text appears before the visualization.
Configuration and setup
How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.
How this scenario is graded
How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.
Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.
- Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
- Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
- Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.
Where this sits in the benchmark
This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.
| Level | Name | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | AI Database Agents → | 28 scenarios · 11 tools |
| Capability | Answer Presentation → | |
| Scenario | The user asks to see the same answer a different way → | |
| Tool | AskYourDatabase → |
Global scenario definition → · Global capability definition → · AskYourDatabase product page →
History of this result
What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.
Act on this result
Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.
You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.
Agree →Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.
Disagree →Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.
Report an issue →Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.
Vendor notice →The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.
Verify the proof files
These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.
File fingerprints (SHA-256)
A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.