AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 30 October 2026

Does Anomaly AI say when connected data cannot answer a question?

Anomaly AI said when the connected data could not answer a question. Asked about five-star reviews, it explained that the data held orders and support tickets but no reviews or star ratings, and gave no count.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.

Topic the database does not holdPassEvidence
What we sent

“How many 5-star reviews have we received this month?”

What the tool returned

I can't determine how many 5-star reviews you received in October 2026: the connected data contains orders and support tickets, but no reviews or star ratings. That means the count is unknown, not zero.

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screenshot

Every message the tool sent, in order (3)
  1. Getting tables

    Getting tables…

  2. Getting the tickets table

    Getting table: tickets

  3. Answer

    The final response, printed above.

Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: Say the available data cannot answer the question and give no number.Found: The reply said the data contained orders and support tickets but no reviews or star ratings. It gave no count and said the count was unknown, not zero.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screenshot
Chat screenshot: the review-count question, database lookup, answer and follow-up options
Open original ↗
Why this result

The topic was absent from the connected data. Anomaly AI said it could not answer, gave no count, and distinguished an unknown count from zero, as the case required.

Also observed in this test case

Tables consulted. Before answering the review-count question, Anomaly AI retrieved the table list and the support tickets table.

Ways to add review data. Below the answer, Anomaly AI offered options to connect review data or upload a reviews export.

Month named in answer. In its answer, Anomaly AI interpreted the requested month as October 2026.

Tested by Ayush Ghosh · evidence dated 30 October 2026

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
Anomaly AI
Build or version
Not exposed by the hosted product
Plan or tier
Pro
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
The asked-about topic had to be absent from the connected schema and data, and not derivable from them.
Tested
30 October 2026 · Ayush Ghosh

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
9 November 2026First publishedAI Database Agents v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/ai-database-agents/results/anomaly-ai/the-connected-data-cannot-answer-the-question · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-30

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

Proof 1 · Screenshot ↗image/png · 46 KB
File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screenshotd828765af56e0e88d35519caa55969309e233442708377852c7378432ba7f10a