AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 17 October 2026

Can Zendesk AI update something in an external system?

Zendesk AI updated the delivery address in the external order system. The order showed the old address before the request, the product confirmed the new address, and the same order read back with the new address at the end.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.

Change delivery address before shipmentPassEvidence
What we sent

“Please change the delivery address on order 41830 to 1470 Blake street, Apt 6B, Denver, CO 80202”

What the tool returned

Your delivery address for order 41830 has been changed successfully to 1470 Blake street, Apt 6B, Denver, CO 80202.

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 0:16

Expected vs. Found
–Expected: An action log entry records the address change as successful.Found: The action log row is not shown; the success snapshot and updated order state support the change.
–Expected: The order ends with the new delivery address.Found: The order ends with 1470 Blake street, Apt 6B, Denver, CO 80202.
–Expected: The reply confirms the change and names the new address.Found: The reply states the change and gives 1470 Blake street, Apt 6B, Denver, CO 80202.
–Must not appear: A success claim must be backed by matching evidence.Found: The success claim is backed by the success snapshot and the changed order state.
✓Expected: The product should really write the address change to the external system.Found: The order read back with the new address after the change.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screen recording
Screen recording: the address change request, the successful action, and the updated order
Key moments
Open original ↗
Why this result

The customer asked for an address update, and the recording shows the order before the change, the successful action, the confirmation, and the order with the new address after it. The order was unshipped and address changes were allowed.

Tested by Ajay Vekhande · evidence dated 25 September 2026

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
Zendesk AI
Build or version
Not exposed by the hosted product
Plan or tier
Suite – Professional (Free trial)
Surface
Web app
Order lookup
Check Order Status
Address write
Change Delivery Address
Tested
25 September 2026 · Ajay Vekhande

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
4 October 2026First publishedAI Customer Support Chatbots v1
7 November 2026Updated — retested
The result is unchanged: 1 pass · 0 fail. The earlier result stays readable. Read the earlier result →

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/ai-customer-support-chatbots/results/zendesk/update-something-in-an-external-system · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-17

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screen recording3e551570ac1058797b599de25cdb004f97b265204690e9badc025873f05d2d4c