AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 17 October 2026

Does Freshdesk Freddy choose the right source or action for support requests?

Freshdesk Freddy used the order system to answer the status request and correctly reported that the order had shipped. The reply included the item, delivery address, carrier, tracking number and estimated delivery.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.

Order status must come from the order systemPassEvidence
What we sent

“Where is my order 41982?”

What the tool returned

I've pulled up order 41982. • Status: Shipped • Item: Linen sheet set, queen — Fog Grey • Ship-to address: 1470 Blake Street, Apt 6B, Denver, CO 80202 • Carrier: UPS • Tracking number: 1Z999AA10123456784 • Estimated delivery: August 28, 2026 You won't be able to change the delivery address on this order anymore, since it's already shipped. If you'd like, I can help you understand the return window or how to track it with UPS.

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 0:23

Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: Report the order's actual shipped status using the order system, not the knowledge base.Found: It used the order system and reported the order as shipped, which was its actual status.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screen recording
Screen recording: the order-status request, order-details lookup and full reply
Key moments
Open original ↗
Why this result

The conversation log shows an order-details lookup before the reply, whose order-specific facts were available only in the order system. This establishes both the required source choice and the real order status.

Tested by Ajay Vekhande · evidence dated 18 September 2026

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
Freshdesk Freddy
Build or version
Not exposed by the hosted product
Plan or tier
Free Enterprise trial
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
The order the customer asked about had to be marked as shipped in the store's order system, with no per-order information in the knowledge base.
Channel
Web Chat
Active workflows
Cancel Membership, Change Delivery Address, Get Order Status
Tested
18 September 2026 · Ajay Vekhande

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
5 October 2026First publishedAI Customer Support Chatbots v1
12 November 2026Updated — retested on not exposed by the hosted service
The result is unchanged: 1 pass · 0 fail. The earlier result stays readable. Read the earlier result →

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/ai-customer-support-chatbots/results/freshdesk/source-action-disambiguation · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-17

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screen recording10f1389affddb97e0e8ca4cdae1ff28e542043007c227a5ba9a4fbfb65c0af78