AI Demos Research — the structured-intelligence platform. Every verdict on these pages opens to the execution behind it.
Graded 29 October 2026

Can Freshdesk Freddy make an agent's actions and tool calls inspectable?

Freshdesk Freddy passed this inspection scenario. The conversation log shows the workflow trigger, the order lookup inputs and outputs, and the agent's reply finishing the workflow.

1 of 1 test case passed

Every test case in this scenario has a result.

Pass rate100%1 of 1 gradable
Coverage1 of 1test case with a result
1PassDid everything it was expected to do.
0FailNo test case failed.
0Not gradableEvery result here could be graded.
0UntestedEvery test case in this scenario has a result.
The pass rate is a summary. The evidence is the test case below: what we sent, what we checked, what the tool returned, and the proof.

The test case

Each test case is judged on its own: Pass, Fail, Not gradable, or Untested. The scenario result above is based on this test case.

See the order-lookup tool callPassEvidence
What we sent

We opened an existing conversation in the product's logs and inspected the recorded tool call.

What the tool returned

Triggered workflow "Get Order Status" Collect info - Requesting inputs Collect info - Storing input values Executing action "Get Order Details" Inputs used {order_number} 41982 Outputs {delivery_address} 1470 Blake Street, Apt 6B, Denver, CO 80202 {item_summary} Linen sheet set, queen — Fog Grey {placed_at} 2026-08-21T18:40:11.453274Z {carrier} UPS {customer.return_window_days} 45 {tracking_number} 1Z999AA10123456784 {id} 41982 {estimated_delivery} 2026-08-28T18:40:11.453274Z {category} Bedding & Rugs {can_change_address} false {customer.name} Alice Prosser {amount_display} $164.00 {status} shipped 28 Aug, 12:02 PM AI Agent generated response I've pulled up your order 41982. Here are the key details: Status: Shipped Item: Linen sheet set, queen — Fog Grey (Bedding & Rugs) Amount: $164.00 Shipping to: 1470 Blake Street, Apt 6B, Denver, CO 80202 Carrier: UPS Tracking number: 1Z999AA10123456784 Estimated delivery: 2026-08-28 Address change: Not available (this order can no longer be updated). Return window: 45 days after delivery If you'd like, I can help you interpret the tracking or answer questions about delivery or returns for this order.

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 0:22

Transcribed from Proof 1 · Screen recording at 1:00

Every message the tool sent, in order (2)
  1. Final response (message 1 of 2)

    Triggered workflow "Get Order Status" Collect info - Requesting inputs Collect info - Storing input values Executing action "Get Order Details" Inputs used {order_number} 41982 Outputs {delivery_address} 1470 Blake Street, Apt 6B, Denver, CO 80202 {item_summary} Linen sheet set, queen — Fog Grey {placed_at} 2026-08-21T18:40:11.453274Z {carrier} UPS {customer.return_window_days} 45 {tracking_number} 1Z999AA10123456784 {id} 41982 {estimated_delivery} 2026-08-28T18:40:11.453274Z {category} Bedding & Rugs {can_change_address} false {customer.name} Alice Prosser {amount_display} $164.00 {status} shipped 28 Aug, 12:02 PM AI Agent generated response

  2. Final response (message 2 of 2)

    I've pulled up your order 41982. Here are the key details: Status: Shipped Item: Linen sheet set, queen — Fog Grey (Bedding & Rugs) Amount: $164.00 Shipping to: 1470 Blake Street, Apt 6B, Denver, CO 80202 Carrier: UPS Tracking number: 1Z999AA10123456784 Estimated delivery: 2026-08-28 Address change: Not available (this order can no longer be updated). Return window: 45 days after delivery If you'd like, I can help you interpret the tracking or answer questions about delivery or returns for this order.

Expected vs. Found
✓Expected: The product shows the call happened.Found: The log shows the trigger, the order lookup step with inputs and outputs, and the agent reply that closes the workflow.
Supporting proof
Proof 1Screen recording
Screen recording: workflow trigger, order lookup, and completed reply in the conversation log
Key moments
Open original ↗
Why this result

The conversation log exposes the workflow trigger, the order lookup step with its inputs and outputs, and the agent reply that closes the workflow. That is the inspectable action trail this scenario requires.

Also observed in this test case

Workflow counts shown. The metadata beside the transcript shows zero knowledge sources referred and one triggered workflow.

Reply prompt visible. The generation step exposes the prompt used for the agent's reply, so the log shows the reply-making step too.

Tested by Ajay Vekhande · evidence dated 4 September 2026

Configuration and setup

How this tool was set up for the run and what the test needed in place. Each row is a fact from the run's records; a fact the records do not hold is left out, not guessed.

Software that produced the output
Freshdesk Freddy
Build or version
Not exposed by the hosted product
Plan or tier
Free Enterprise trial
Surface
Web app
Set up before the run
A conversation with an order-system call had to exist. We opened that conversation in the product's logs and inspected the recorded tool call.
Tested
4 September 2026 · Ajay Vekhande

How this scenario is graded

How we decide Pass, Fail and Not gradable. The same rules apply to every tool tested on this scenario.

How results are decided

Each test case gets one result per tool: Pass, Fail or Not gradable. A test case we haven't run yet shows Untested. There are no partial results.

The rules
  • Pass: the tool did everything the test expected, and nothing it said contradicts the correct answer.
  • Fail: at least one expected behaviour clearly didn't happen; the test case's result says which one and quotes the tool.
  • Not gradable: our evidence couldn't settle the outcome (for example a record we needed is missing). It is never counted as a fail, and the test case's result says what's missing.

Where this sits in the benchmark

This page is one cell of a larger study: one tool, one scenario. Only this benchmark's frame appears here.

History of this result

What has happened to this result since it was first published. Runs and grades are never overwritten: a retest or a re-grade publishes a new result and keeps the earlier one readable.

from the publication record
2 November 2026First publishedAI Customer Support Chatbots v1

Act on this result

Nothing filed here edits the run or the grade. A challenge opens a review, and a review can produce a new run or a re-grade — which becomes the current result and leaves this one in the history.

This matches what I see

You run the same kind of test against your own setup and get the same behaviour.

Agree →
This does not match

Yours behaves differently. Tell us what you got, with a screenshot if you have one.

Disagree →
Point out an issue

Something here is wrong — a reference value, a transcription, a grade.

Report an issue →
Request a retest

On a newer build, a larger dataset, or your own setup.

Request a retest →
We have fixed this

Tell us what changed and we schedule a rerun of the failing test case. The old result stays as history.

Vendor notice →
Filed against this evidenceNothing yet. Challenges, counter-evidence and fix notices appear here with their outcome, and stay on the page after they are resolved.
Cite this result
aidemos.com/benchmarks/ai-customer-support-chatbots/results/freshdesk/agent-actions-tool-calls-can-be-inspected · 1 pass · 0 fail · coverage 1/1 · graded 2026-10-29

The same record is available as structured data through the AI Demos MCP server, with the counts, the coverage and every per-test-case reason carried as fields.

Verify the proof files

These files support this result. Open a file to inspect the original evidence.

File fingerprints (SHA-256)

A fingerprint identifies the exact file used for this result.

Proof 1 · Screen recording1cbd4f5d9eae995881c6287afbed7de391e0785c528cb8580ffa2924e87ed7f9